In its most general sense, charity may be defined as the act of giving to each one what he lacks.
That is to say, in the last analysis, to put each thing in its place, which would result in the establishment of the supreme justice upon earth.
Such is the theory, but in practice charity could be considered as the path men ought to follow in their groping advance towards justice.
For, in his present state of evolution, man is incapable not only of realising justice in his earthly abode, but also of conceiving it as it is in its absolute essence. Charity is the living acknowledgment of this inability.
Indeed, in our ignorance of true justice, the justice which is one with perfect harmony, perfect equilibrium and perfect order, our wisest course is to take the path of love, the path of charity which shuns all judgment.
This is what justifies the attitude of those who always set charity against justice. Justice is, in their eyes, rigorous, merciless, and charity must come to temper its excessive severity.
Certainly, they cannot speak thus of divine justice, but more rightly of human or rather of social justice, the egoistic justice which is instituted to defend a more or less extensive grouping of interests and is as much opposed to true justice as shadow is contrary to light.
When we speak of justice as it is rendered in our so-called civilised countries, we should call it not rigorous and merciless but blind and monstrous in its ignorant pretension.
So we can never make too many amends for its fatal effects, and there charity finds an opportunity to apply itself fruitfully.
But this is only one side of the question and before delving deeper into our subject, I would like to remind you that charity, like all other human activities, is exercised according to four different modes which must be simultaneous if its action is to be integral and truly effective. I mean that no charity is complete if it is not at the same time material, intellectual, spiritual or moral and, above all, loving, for the very essence of charity is love.
At present charity is considered almost exclusively from the external standpoint and the word is synonymous with the sharing of part of one’s possessions with life’s rejects. We shall see in a moment how mean this conception is even when confined to the purely material field.
The three other modes of action of charity are admirably summed up in this counsel given by the Buddha to his disciples:
“With your hearts overflowing with compassion, go forth into this world torn by pain, be instructors, and wherever the darkness of ignorance rules, there light a torch.”
To instruct those who know less, to give to those who do evil the strength to come out of their error, to console those who suffer, these are all occupations of charity rightly understood.
Thus charity, regarded from the individual point of view, consists, for each one, of giving to others all they need, in proportion to one’s means.
This brings us to two observations.
The first is that one cannot give what one does not have at one’s command.
Materially this is so evident that it is unnecessary to insist upon it. But intellectually, spiritually, the same rule holds true.
Indeed, how can one teach others what one does not know? How can one guide the weak on the path of wisdom if one does not tread the path oneself? How can one radiate love if one does not possess it within oneself?
And the supreme charity, which is integral self-giving to the great work of terrestrial regeneration, implies first of all that one can command what one wants to offer, that is to say, that one is master of oneself.
Only he who has perfect self-control can consecrate himself in all sincerity to the great work. For he alone knows that no contrary will, no unexpected impulse can ever again come to impede his action, to check his effort by setting him at variance with himself.
In this fact we find the justification of the old proverb which says: “Charity begins at home.”
This maxim seems to encourage every kind of egoism, and yet it is the expression of a great wisdom for one who understands it rightly.
The Mother: CWM 2